the why“. In the LAW OF NATIONS and International Conventions, the words “tacit” and “acquiescence” are used many times. It is also mentioned in SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS, and in case you have not researched s.w.f.s.w. (although it’s mentioned repeatedly in A/V’s here). Check the Resource section for links.
The way that world events are unfolding, one might think that things were happening outside the International and Universal Public Order. Make no mistake about it, nothing is happening without Universal Permission and Consent (even if that Consent is manufactured). And, “the why” is the source of it all.
So, let’s look at some of these documents; like the LAW OF NATIONS, which is the “primer” for International Law and “how this world works. Then, we can build our own “case” for Consent, so that we know exactly why world events are unfolding as they are.
1.) LAW OF NATIONS. This is a direct quote; “First, the long and ordinary PRACTICE of nations, which affords evidence of a general custom, tacitly agreed to be observed until expressly abrogated. And — secondly, the customary law, or that which, from motives of convenience, has by tacit but implied agreement prevailed, not generally indeed among all nations, nor with so paramount utility as to become a portion of universal voluntary law, but enough to have acquired a prescriptive obligation among certain states”
- 25. Customary law of nations. Certain maxims and customs, consecrated by long use, and observed by nations in their mutual intercourse with each other as a kind of law, form the Customary Law of Nations, or the Custom of Nations. This law is founded on a tacit consent, or, if you please, on a tacit convention of the nations, that observe it towards each other.
- 27. Positive law of nations.These three kinds of law of nations, the Voluntary, the Conventional, and the Customary, together constitute the Positive Law of Nations. (10) For they all proceed from the will of Nations; the Voluntary from their Presumed Consent, the Conventional from an express consent, and the Customary from tacit consent; and as there can be no other mode of deducing any law from the will of nations, there are only these three kinds of Positive Law of Nations.
2.) PADLEFORD v. SAVANNAH (GEORGIA). (1854) Supposing this not to be a tax for inspection purposes, has Congress consented to its being laid? It is certain that Congress has not expressly consented. But is express consent necessary? There is nothing in the Constitution which says so. There is nothing in the practice of men, or in the Municipal Law of men, or in the practice of nations, or the Law of nations that says so. Silence gives consent, is the rule of business life. A tender of bank bills is as good as one of coin, unless the bills are objected to. To stand by, in silence, and see another sell your property, binds you. These are mere instances of the use of the maxim in the Municipal Law. In the Law of Nations, it is equally potent. Silent acquiescence in the breach of a treaty binds a Nation. Express consent, then, not being necessary, is there anything from which consent may be implied? There is the length of time. (Vattel, ch. 16,sec. 199,book 1. See book2, sec.1 42, et seq. as to usucaption and prescription, and sec . 208 as to ratification.)
3.) SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS: consent, the Primary Victory: A silent weapon system operates upon data obtained from a docile public by legal (but not always lawful) force. Much information is made available to silent weapon systems programmers through the Internal Revenue Service. (See Studies in the Structure of the American Economy for an I.R.S. source list.) This information consists of the enforced delivery of well-organized data contained in federal and state tax forms, collected, assembled, and submitted by slave labor provided by taxpayers and employers. Furthermore, the number of such forms submitted to the I.R.S. is a useful indicator of public consent, an important factor in strategic decision making. Other data sources are given in the Short List of Inputs. consent Coefficients – numerical feedback indicating victory status. Psychological basis: When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay income tax despite an obvious lack of reciprocal or honest service from the government.
Amplification Energy Sources: The next step in the process of designing an economic amplifier is discovering the energy sources. The energy sources which support any primitive economic system are, of course, a supply of raw materials, and the consent of the people to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or class in the social structure, i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the pecking order. Each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class immediately below it, hence preserves the class structure. This provides stability and security, but also government from the top. As time goes on and communication and education improve, the lower-class elements of the social labor structure become knowledgeable and envious of the good things that the upper-class members have. They also begin to attain a knowledge of energy systems and the ability to enforce their rise through the class structure. This threatens the sovereignty of the elite. If this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite can achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a position of an essential energy source. Until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of people to labor and let others handle their affairs must be taken into consideration, since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final transfer of energy sources to the control of the elite. It is essential to recognize that at this time, public consent is still an essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic amplification. Therefore, consent as an energy release mechanism will now be considered.
The Political Structure of a Nation – Dependency: The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a political structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own dependency relationship of childhood. Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life, pat them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner table, clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that everything will be alright when they wake up in the morning (consent). This public demand (consent) is incredible, so the human god, the politician, meets incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering nothing. So who is the bigger liar? the public? or the “godfather”? This public behavior (consent) is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency. It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public.
Action/Offense: Most people want to be able to subdue and/or kill other human beings which disturb their daily lives, but they do not want to have to cope with the moral and religious issues which such an overt act on their part might raise. Therefore, they assign the dirty work (consent) to others (including their own children) so as to keep the blood off their hands (consent). They rave about the humane treatment of animals and then sit down to a delicious hamburger from a whitewashed slaughterhouse down the street and out of sight. But even more hypocritical, they pay taxes (consent) to finance a professional association of hit men collectively called politicians and then complain about corruption in government. Again, most people want to be free to do the things (to explore, etc.) but they are afraid to fail. The fear of failure is manifested in irresponsibility (tacit consent), and especially in delegating (consent) those personal responsibilities to others where success is uncertain or carries possible or created liabilities (law) which the person is not prepared to accept (consent). They want authority (root word – “author”), but they will not accept responsibility or liability. So they hire politicians (consent) to face reality for them.
Summary: Politicians hold many quasi-military jobs, the lowest being the police which are soldiers, the attorneys, and C.P.A.s next who are spies and saboteurs (licensed), and the judges who shout orders and run the closed union military shop for whatever the market will bear. The generals are industrialists. The “presidential” level of commander-in-chief is shared by the international bankers. The people know that they have created this farce (consent) and financed it with their own taxes (consent), but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite. Thus, a nation becomes divided into two very distinct parts, a docile sub-nation
[great silent majority]
and a political sub-nation. The political sub-nation remains attached to the docile sub-nation, tolerates it, and leaches its substance until it grows strong enough to detach itself and then devour its parent.
4.) Origin of TACIT
c.1600, from French tacite, from Latin tacitus “that is passed over in silence, done without words, assumed, silent,” prop. pp. of tacere “to be silent,” from PIE root *tak- “to be silent” (cf. Gothic þahan, Old Norse þegja“to be silent,” Old Norse þagna “to grow dumb,” Old Saxon thagian, Old High German dagen “to be silent”). The musical instruction tacet is the 3rd person present singular of the Latin verb.
The LAW OF NATIONS. This is the “primmer” for International Law and “how this world works”.
- 25. Customary law of nations.
Certain maxims and customs, consecrated by long use, and observed by nations in their mutual intercourse with each other as a kind of law, form the Customary Law of Nations, or the Custom of Nations. (8) This law is founded on a tacit consent, or, if you please, on a tacit convention of the nations, that observe it towards each other.
Click “tacit”. It has a link: TACIT
‘NUFF SAID about consent. I trust that you understand “the why” by now. If not….READ THE AGREEMENTS AGAIN.!
Sunday - Paul Update
Talkshoe Radio Interview
Okay…looks like this turned into a nice sized blog. I am including an audio that I did on Sunday with Paul-D (downloadable above, about 12 minutes), and the “TalkShoe program” that I did last Wednesday (above and uncut); and an A/V presentation that I did yesterday with Paul-H. I mentioned follow-up, so I’m posting a link and a short-version the South Park episode that Paul-H and I discussed in the Video Newsletter (below). As stated; this South Park show is a blatantly disgusting view of the effects of not reading and/or understanding a Consensual Contractual Agreement. But as stated in the program; this will surely be the future for you and your Posterity; if “we all” do not “raise our Collective Knowledge/Wisdom (i.e.)Consciousness” by becoming educated and by educating others that the Universe has entrusted “us” to educate….BY CONSENT AND AGREEMENT.
One more resource that I am including as a download is this “pdf”….Competency Email for Blog
Read It: Part 1
Read It: Part 2
Read It: Part 3